Polity Atlas
DisputedSource attached · not independently reviewedCLM-1049 · as of 2026-10-30 · about: Political meritocracy (the 'China model' debate) · Author: Polity Atlas editorial team

“Whether China's cadre system rewards performance is disputed: Li and Zhou (2005) find that provincial leaders' promotion chances rose with economic growth, whereas Shih, Adolph and Liu (2012) find no evidence that growth was rewarded with higher Central Committee rank and point to factional ties, education and revenue collection.”

Context. Jia, Kudamatsu and Seim (2015) reconcile the findings in part: performance matters most for officials who also have connections to senior leaders.

Evidence that supports

1

Evidence that contradicts

1

Context

Political Selection in China: The Complementary Roles of Connections and Performance

Status history

No earlier revisions.

Disputes

No disputes have been filed.

Dispute or add evidence

Submissions are reviewed by an editor and logged publicly on this claim. A source is required.

Your evidence
Not signed in — leave an email so an editor can follow up.