03 · Governance Explorer
Side-by-side view →Compare mechanisms, not ideologies
Choose the systems, choose what matters to you and how much. The result is a conditional comparison under your priorities — not a ranking of “the best political system”.
Weighted result
Conditional comparison.
Levels are evidence-graded and linked to claims; “unknown” is excluded from the weighted result, never counted as zero.
| Criterion | Landsgemeinde of Glarus | Ireland Citizens' Assembly (2016–2018) | Mondragon cooperatives | Próspera (Roatán, Honduras) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rights guarantees ×3 | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
| Appeal of decisions ×3 | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
| Corruption resistance ×3 | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
| Minority protection ×3 | Mixed | Mixed | Unknown | Unknown |
| Works under conflict ×3 | Unknown | Strong | Unknown | Unknown |
| Accountability ×3 | Strong | Moderate | Strong | Mixed |
| Efficiency ×3 | Moderate | Moderate | Unknown | Unknown |
| Resilience ×3 | Strong | Unknown | Moderate | Weak |
| Economic incentives ×3 | Unknown | Unknown | Moderate | Unknown |
| Freedom ×3 | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown |
| Conflict resolution ×3 | Unknown | Unknown | Unknown | Moderate |
| Weighted result | 4.3 / 57 criteria unknown, excluded | 4.0 / 57 criteria unknown, excluded | 4.3 / 58 criteria unknown, excluded | 3.0 / 58 criteria unknown, excluded |
Read this as“Under my weights, with today’s evidence, which designs hold up best on what I care about?” Change a weight and the answer may change.