Polity Atlas
Closed / failedDeliberative / sortition

Climate Assembly UK (2020)

A citizens' assembly of 108 randomly selected UK residents, commissioned by six House of Commons select committees, that met over six weekends in 2020 and set out how the UK should reach net zero by 2050. Its report was advisory; the government never gave the point-by-point response MPs asked for.

Location
Reference point: Birmingham, where the in-person weekends were held; the assembly drew members from the whole UK
Operating since
2020
Governance
Deliberative / sortition
Legal status
Recognised
Economy
Not applicable
Autonomy level
Program within an existing state
Uses AI in governance
No

Background

In June 2019 the UK became the first major economy to legislate a target of net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050. The target was set; the path was not. Climate protest that year included demands from Extinction Rebellion for a citizens' assembly, and the French government was preparing its own Citizens' Convention for Climate. In Westminster, the initiative came not from government but from Parliament: six House of Commons select committees — Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy; Environmental Audit; Housing, Communities and Local Government; Science and Technology; Transport; and Treasury — jointly commissioned Climate Assembly UK to ask how the UK should meet its target.

The parliamentary origin matters. Select committees scrutinise government; they cannot legislate or bind ministers. The assembly was therefore designed as an input to committee inquiries and to public debate, not as a decision-making body.

How it is governed

  • Selection. Invitations were posted to 30,000 households chosen at random. From those who responded, 108 members were drawn by a "civic lottery" stratified by age, gender, education, ethnicity, region, urban or rural residence and — unusually — level of concern about climate change, so that sceptics were present in proportion. Extra places were reserved for people from more deprived postcodes to offset expected response bias. The Sortition Foundation ran the selection.
  • Design and delivery. Involve, a participation charity, designed and facilitated the process; mySociety handled digital communication. Four expert leads, including the head of the government's statutory Committee on Climate Change, Chris Stark, oversaw balance of evidence, and members heard 47 speakers ranging from business and trade unions to farmers' and environmental groups.
  • Mandate. Members were not asked whether to reach net zero, which Parliament had already decided, but how. The remit covered areas including surface transport, air travel, heat and energy use in the home, what we buy, food and land use, electricity generation and greenhouse gas removal, and members were divided into thematic groups.
  • Process. Three weekends met in person in Birmingham from January 2020. When COVID-19 struck, the final weekend was moved online and split across three online weekends, ending in May 2020. Members voted by secret ballot on options and principles; the final report, The Path to Net Zero, published on 10 September 2020, ran to more than 550 pages and recorded the level of support for every recommendation.

Economy and public goods

The assembly was funded by the House of Commons, which provided £120,000, together with two philanthropic funders, the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and the European Climate Foundation, which gave £200,000 each, raised to £220,000 each to cover extra costs caused by COVID-19 — about £560,000 in all. Members received £150 per weekend, and their travel, accommodation, food and costs such as childcare were covered.

The public good produced was information: a detailed record of what an informed cross-section of the public would accept — for example, a frequent-flyer levy, a ban on new petrol and diesel cars by 2030–2035, changes to diet and farming, and a preference for natural carbon removal such as forests and peatland over engineered options. An interim briefing in June 2020 reported that around 80% of members wanted the economic recovery from the pandemic to be designed to help reach net zero.

Conflict and disputes

  • Scope versus depth. The peer-reviewed evaluation by Elstub, Carrick, Farrell and Mockler argues that stretching the assembly across every sector of a net-zero economy compromised members' learning, the coordination of recommendations and their endorsement: because members worked in thematic groups, many recommendations were endorsed by only one group rather than the whole assembly.
  • Agenda control. The evaluators recommend that members have more say over the remit and the information they receive; the agenda was set by parliamentary clerks, organisers and expert leads.
  • Government response. The committee chairs wrote to Prime Minister Boris Johnson on 10 September 2020 asking for a formal response before the end of the year. In July 2021 the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee reported that ministers had backed away from a promised point-by-point response and asked the government to say which recommendations it accepted, in full or in part, and which it rejected.

Outcomes

Members' recommendations entered Parliament's work rather than law. The evaluation found that several later select committee inquiries cited the report and that many MPs valued it as insight into informed public opinion. Members' knowledge and political confidence rose, and deliberative quality improved over time; moving online did not appear to harm it. The Westminster Foundation for Democracy later described the assembly's influence as agenda-setting at best. There was no mechanism obliging government to act, and none was used.

Lessons for institution design

  1. Commissioner and mandate shape impact. An assembly convened by scrutiny committees can inform debate but has no one obliged to answer it. A response duty — with a deadline and a reasoned reply to each recommendation — needs to be agreed before the assembly starts, not requested afterwards.
  2. Narrower remits produce stronger recommendations. Covering a whole economy in six weekends forced thematic splits that weakened whole-assembly endorsement.
  3. Stratifying on attitudes is feasible. Including climate-sceptic members in proportion helped answer the charge that the assembly was stacked.
  4. Online deliberation can work. The forced move online in 2020 showed that remote sessions need not lower deliberative quality, which can reduce cost and allow longer processes.

Further reading

Timeline

  1. 2019Six House of Commons select committees announce Climate Assembly UK to ask how the UK should reach its net-zero-by-2050 target.Established
  2. Jan 2020The 108 members meet for the first weekend in Birmingham (January); three in-person weekends are held before COVID-19 restrictions. [S2]Established
  3. May 2020The final sessions move online across three weekends, ending in May; an interim briefing in June backs a recovery designed to reach net zero. [S1]Established
  4. Sept 2020The report The Path to Net Zero is published (10 September); the six committee chairs ask the Prime Minister for a formal response before the year's end. [S1]Established
  5. Jul 2021The official evaluation is published (15 July), finding improved deliberation over time and no loss of quality online. [S4]Established
  6. Jul 2021The BEIS Committee reports that ministers have dropped a promised point-by-point response and asks the government to state which recommendations it accepts. [S5]Established

Mechanisms in use

Outcomes & controversies

Final report The Path to Net Zero (10 September 2020) with more than 50 recommendations and 25 principles. Committees cited it in later inquiries; in July 2021 the BEIS Committee said ministers had dropped a promised point-by-point response.

Post-mortem

A one-off, advisory assembly commissioned by select committees, which could not bind government. It ended with its report; its influence ran through committee work and public debate, and evaluators judged its broad scope a weakness.

Claims

EstablishedCLM-0454 · checked 2026-10-27

Climate Assembly UK was commissioned by six House of Commons select committees and had 108 members chosen by civic lottery. It met over three in-person weekends in Birmingham and three online weekends between January and May 2020, and published its report on 10 September 2020.[1][2][3]

EstablishedCLM-0455 · checked 2026-10-27

Its evaluators found that adapting the assembly's scope to the scale of climate change compromised members' learning, the coordination of recommendations, members' endorsement of them and their impact on parliament and government, and argued for more democratic agenda-setting.[1][2]

EstablishedCLM-0456 · checked 2026-10-27

In July 2021 the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee said the government had initially promised a point-by-point response to the assembly's report but no longer planned one, and asked it to state which recommendations it accepted in full or part and which it rejected.[1]

EstablishedCLM-0457 · checked 2026-10-27

Climate Assembly UK was funded with £120,000 from the House of Commons and £220,000 each from the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and the European Climate Foundation; members received £150 per weekend plus expenses.[1]

Sources