Petitions to the drafting group were graduated by signatures: 5,000 brought a formal legal analysis, 10,000 a presentation to drafting-group members, and 50,000 a meeting with the mayor, who committed to include the proposal in the draft. 341 proposals were submitted and 14 petitions were incorporated.[1]
Mexico City's crowdsourced constitution (2016–2017)
When Mexico City became a federal entity in 2016, its first constitution was drafted with online petitions, a city-wide survey and collaborative editing, then debated by a 100-member Constituent Assembly. 341 petitions drew more than 270,000 signers; the charter was approved on 31 January 2017 and took effect in September 2018.
- Location
- Reference point: the Zócalo, Mexico City
- Operating since
- 2016
- Governance
- Hybrid
- Legal status
- Recognised
- Economy
- Not applicable
- Autonomy level
- Program within an existing state
- Uses AI in governance
- No
Background
For most of the twentieth century Mexico City, as the Federal District, was governed directly by the federal government; its residents elected their own head of government only from 1997. A federal constitutional reform in 2016 turned the district into Mexico City (CDMX), a federal entity with its own constitution, a unicameral Congress and elected mayors (alcaldes) for its sixteen boroughs in place of the old delegations.
The reform required a Constituent Assembly to adopt the city's first constitution on the basis of a draft prepared by the head of government, Miguel Ángel Mancera. Mancera chose to open the drafting to the public, and asked the city's innovation office, the Laboratorio para la Ciudad, to design the process.
How it is governed
- Drafting group. A working group of about thirty prominent citizens — activists, artists, Olympians, constitutional scholars and academics — reviewed public input weekly and wrote the draft, coordinated by the city's general counsel.
- Petitions. From 30 March to 15 July 2016 anyone could start or sign a petition on Change.org, which partnered with the city. Thresholds set the response: at 5,000 signatures a petition received a formal legal analysis; at 10,000 its proposer presented it to three members of the drafting group; at 50,000 the proposer met the mayor, who committed to include the proposal explicitly in the draft.
- Survey. A seven-question survey, Imagina tu Ciudad, asked residents about their hopes, fears and ideas for the city. About 30,000 valid responses came from some 1,474 neighbourhoods; high-school volunteers ran nearly half of them in person to reach people offline. The dataset was released as open data.
- Collaborative editing and events. Essays were posted on PubPub, an annotation platform developed at the MIT Media Lab, for public comment, and 55 citizen-led events were registered.
- Constituent Assembly. The draft went to a 100-member assembly: 60 elected by proportional representation on a single city-wide list on 5 June 2016, 14 chosen by the Senate, 14 by the Chamber of Deputies, 6 by the President of the Republic and 6 by the head of government. The assembly sat from 15 September 2016 to 31 January 2017 and could amend the draft freely.
Economy and public goods
The online platform reportedly cost about $15,000 to build, plus outreach, kiosks and devices; overall costs of the process are not reported in the sources reviewed. The constitution itself defines public goods as rights: among them the right to the city, a healthy environment, priority for pedestrians and cyclists, leisure time, animal protection and recognition of the city as plurilingual and pluricultural; Article 57 incorporates the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.
Conflict and disputes
- Legitimacy of the assembly. Forty of the hundred members were appointed by federal and city authorities rather than elected, so the assembly's popular mandate was only partial. In the election for the other sixty, about 2.1 million votes were cast; Morena won the largest share (33%), ahead of the PRD (29%).
- Trust in the tools. Officials initially saw Change.org as a platform for opposition campaigns, and many citizens doubted the process would matter.
- Digital divide. Kiosks sometimes failed, and volunteers turned to paper surveys in markets and metro stations.
- Legal challenges. After adoption the constitution was challenged before the Supreme Court, including by federal authorities. The case study reports that the Court referred to the public engagement in upholding the process.
Outcomes
The petition phase received 341 proposals. According to the case study, they gathered 274,644 unique supporters and 427,815 signatures in total; four petitions passed 50,000 signatures and 14 were incorporated into the draft — for example a sixteen-year-old's petition on rescuing the city's rivers, which became part of Article 16. The organisers estimate that the Constituent Assembly approved about 84% of the co-created content by the required qualified majority.
The assembly approved the constitution on 31 January 2017; it was published in February 2017 and entered into force on 17 September 2018, when the first city Congress took office, followed by the first head of government under the new charter on 5 December 2018. The charter is often described as one of the most progressive in Latin America. How much of its content is attributable to crowdsourcing, rather than to the drafting group and parties, is not independently measured.
Lessons for institution design
- Thresholds turn petitions into obligations. Graduated responses — analysis, a hearing, a mayoral commitment — gave signers a predictable return and gave drafters a manageable filter.
- Mix online and offline channels. Volunteer-run paper surveys widened reach beyond the digitally connected.
- Crowdsourcing upstream needs authority downstream. Unlike Iceland's crowdsourced draft, this one went to a body with the power to adopt it, which is why many proposals survived.
- Measure influence independently. Organiser-reported uptake figures are useful but not a substitute for systematic comparison of inputs and final text.
Further reading
Timeline
- Jan 2016A federal constitutional reform turns the Federal District into Mexico City, a federal entity that must adopt its own constitution. [S2]Established
- Mar 2016Petitions on Change.org open on 30 March, with thresholds of 5,000, 10,000 and 50,000 signatures; they close on 15 July. [S1]Established
- Jun 201660 members of the Constituent Assembly are elected on a single city-wide list (5 June). [S2]Established
- Sept 2016The Constituent Assembly is installed on 15 September to debate the draft. [S2]Established
- Jan 2017The assembly approves the Constitution of Mexico City in its entirety (31 January).Established
- Sept 2018The constitution enters into force on 17 September with the first city Congress; the first head of government under it takes office on 5 December.Established
Outcomes & controversies
341 petitions with more than 270,000 unique signers, about 30,000 survey responses; 14 petitions were incorporated into the draft. The Constituent Assembly approved the constitution on 31 January 2017; it entered into force on 17 September 2018.
Post-mortem
The participatory drafting ended when the draft went to the Constituent Assembly in September 2016; the assembly dissolved after adopting the constitution on 31 January 2017. The charter remains in force, amended by the city Congress.
Claims
The Constituent Assembly had 100 members: 60 elected by proportional representation on 5 June 2016, 14 chosen by the Senate, 14 by the Chamber of Deputies, 6 by the President and 6 by the head of government. It sat from 15 September 2016 to 31 January 2017.[1]
The organisers estimate that the Constituent Assembly approved about 84% of the co-created content; the share of the final constitution attributable to public input has not been independently measured.[1]