Polity Atlas
Network polityHybrid

Legislature by lot

A bicameral design proposed by John Gastil and Erik Olin Wright: an elected chamber paired with an equally empowered chamber of randomly selected citizens. It remains a proposal.

Location
Online
Operating since
2018
Governance
Hybrid
Legal status
Not applicable
Economy
Not applicable
Autonomy level
Program within an existing state
Uses AI in governance
No

Gastil and Wright proposed the design in a 2018 Politics & Society article and the 2019 Verso volume Legislature by Lot. The legislature would have an elected chamber and a 'sortition assembly', with equal powers: each can initiate legislation and vote on the other's bills. Members of the sortition chamber would be well paid, trained and supported by staff, serving overlapping multi-year terms. Earlier proposals include Callenbach and Phillips (1985) and Barnett and Carty's The Athenian Option for the House of Lords. Partial parallels only: the German-speaking Community of Belgium has had a permanent lot-selected Citizens' Council since 2019, but it sets agendas for citizens' assemblies and does not legislate. Objections: accountability, representativeness of those who accept service, and political equality in a small chamber.

Timeline

  1. 1985Callenbach and Phillips publish A Citizen Legislature, an earlier book-length proposal for legislative sortition.Established
  2. 2008Barnett and Carty's The Athenian Option (2nd edition) proposes replacing the House of Lords with a randomly selected body.Established
  3. 2018Gastil and Wright publish 'Legislature by Lot' in Politics & Society, proposing an elected chamber and a sortition chamber with equal powers. [S1]Established
  4. Sept 2019German-speaking Community of Belgium legislates a permanent lot-selected Citizens' Council (installed 16 September); a partial parallel, not a legislative chamber. [S3]Established
  5. 2019Verso publishes Legislature by Lot, edited by Gastil and Wright, with sixteen essays responding to the proposal. [S2]Established

Mechanisms in use

Outcomes & controversies

Not adopted by a legislature. Gastil and Wright's own conclusion points to 'ideal settings for experimenting with sortition'; the 2019 volume collects sixteen responses from advocates and critics.

Claims

EstablishedCLM-0311 · checked 2026-10-23

Gastil and Wright propose a two-chamber legislature with an elected chamber and a randomly selected 'sortition assembly' of equal powers, each able to initiate legislation and vote on the other's bills, with well-paid, trained members in staggered terms.[1][2]

EstablishedCLM-0312 · checked 2026-10-23

A 2019 decree of the German-speaking Community of Belgium created a permanent Citizens' Council and temporary citizens' assemblies, both selected by lot, which formulate recommendations; elected representatives and the minister then decide whether and how to implement them. This is a partial parallel, not a lot-selected legislature.[1][2]

DisputedCLM-0313 · checked 2026-10-23

Owen and Smith argue that the Gastil–Wright design, as conceived, would not sufficiently secure political equality and deliberative reasoning unless sortition were combined with rotation and a limited mandate, and propose a larger chamber with more internal sortition.[1][2]

Sources