Polity Atlas
Institution type

DAO (decentralised autonomous organisation)

An organisation whose rules and treasury are encoded in smart contracts on a blockchain, usually governed by token-holder votes.

Compare
Source attached · not independently reviewedLast verified 2026-10-01 · revision 2 · 1 reviewersRevision historyЧитать на русском

Idea

A decentralised autonomous organisation coordinates people and money through rules encoded in smart contracts on a blockchain, with decisions typically taken by token-holder votes.

Theory

DAOs promise transparent treasuries and rules that execute automatically, reducing the need to trust managers. Governance designs range from one-token-one-vote to delegation, quadratic schemes and reputation systems.

Real examples

  • 'The DAO' (2016) raised a large sum in ether and was drained through a code exploit, leading to the Ethereum hard fork.
  • Wyoming recognised DAO LLCs in 2021; CityDAO organised under that law.
  • Gitcoin used quadratic funding to allocate grants.

Critique

Token voting tends toward plutocracy, participation is often low, and smart-contract bugs are hard to reverse. A US federal court held in 2023 that the Ooki DAO could be liable as an unincorporated association, showing that 'code is law' does not shield members from legal liability.

Results

DAOs are an active field of institutional experimentation with real treasuries. Evidence on their long-term governance quality is still thin.

Related

Real examples

A DAO organised as a Wyoming DAO LLC in 2021 that acquired land in Wyoming and governs it through token-holder votes.

A Solana-based DAO that decides proposals through conditional pass/fail token markets instead of token votes. It launched in November 2023 and later built a launchpad whose project treasuries are governed the same way.

An interdisciplinary research collective, operating online, that studies and builds tools for digital self-governance.

A blockchain-based dispute-resolution protocol launched on Ethereum in 2018. Crowdsourced jurors, drawn in proportion to staked tokens, rule on cases and are paid by incentives designed to reward votes that match the final ruling.

Claims

EstablishedCLM-0029 · checked 2026-10-23

In 2016 an exploit drained a large share of the ether held by 'The DAO', leading the Ethereum community to adopt a contentious hard fork to return the funds.[1]

Assess it in the Governance Explorer →

Revision history

  1. 2026-10-23rev 2 — Seed import
  2. 2026-10-23rev 1 — Seed import