Polity Atlas
DisputedSource attached · not independently reviewedCLM-0212 · as of 2026-10-23 · about: Consociationalism · Author: Polity Atlas editorial team

“Scholars disagree about whether consociational power-sharing stabilises divided societies or entrenches the divisions; Horowitz favours incentives for cross-group voting, and in Sejdić and Finci (2009) the European Court of Human Rights found Bosnia's reserved offices discriminatory.”

Context. Outcomes differ by case; critics and defenders often assess different time horizons.

Evidence that supports

1

Evidence that contradicts

1

Context

Sejdić and Finci v. Bosnia and Herzegovina, Grand Chamber judgment, applications nos. 27996/06 and 34836/06, 22 December 2009

Status history

No earlier revisions.

Disputes

No disputes have been filed.

Dispute or add evidence

Submissions are reviewed by an editor and logged publicly on this claim. A source is required.

Your evidence
Not signed in — leave an email so an editor can follow up.