Idea
An economy in which paid work is no longer the main way people earn income, status and a claim on public resources, because automation performs much of it.
Theory
Keynes speculated in 1930 that his grandchildren's generation might work fifteen hours a week. Today's debate turns on how many tasks AI can perform and how fast. Frey and Osborne (2013, published 2017) estimated a large share of US jobs at high risk of automation; a task-based OECD analysis by Arntz, Gregory and Zierahn (2016) found a much smaller share.
Real examples
- Alaska's Permanent Fund Dividend shares resource income with residents.
- Finland's 2017–2018 basic income experiment tested unconditional payments.
- Proposals for AI dividends and public capital funds remain proposals.
Critique
Past waves of automation created new jobs as well as destroying old ones, and forecasts of mass technological unemployment have repeatedly failed. Critics also argue that work provides meaning and social ties that cash cannot replace.
Results
No economy is post-labour today. Statements about its arrival are forecasts and are marked as such, with a horizon so they can be checked later.
Related
Claims
Proposed institutional responses to declining labour income include universal basic income and social dividends from collectively owned capital.[1]
AI-driven automation will reduce aggregate demand for human labour enough to require new income-distribution institutions in OECD countries by 2035.
Revision history
- 2026-10-23rev 2 — Seed import
- 2026-10-23rev 1 — Seed import