Polity Atlas
DisputedSource attached · not independently reviewedCLM-0217 · as of 2026-10-23 · about: Public choice theory · Author: Polity Atlas editorial team

“How well rational-choice assumptions explain political behaviour is disputed; Green and Shapiro (1994) argued that many applications fail empirical tests, while proponents point to successes in predicting interest-group and electoral behaviour.”

Context. Disagreement concerns which applications count as successes and which tests are fair.

Evidence that supports

1

Evidence that contradicts

1

Status history

No earlier revisions.

Disputes

No disputes have been filed.

Dispute or add evidence

Submissions are reviewed by an editor and logged publicly on this claim. A source is required.

Your evidence
Not signed in — leave an email so an editor can follow up.