How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | + Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Proposals pass or fail by comparing the time-weighted average price of the token in conditional pass and fail markets; no token vote.Futarchy | Grand Council of 50 chiefs chosen by clan mothers; questions pass between groups of nations, each seeking unanimity, with the Onondaga Firekeepers confirming or resolving disagreement. | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | No court; contested outcomes are settled by the market result, with protocol fixes after incidents. | The Confederacy describes the Grand Council as resolving disputes among the nations and planning for the welfare of all the people. | |
| How are public goods funded? | Treasury spending and contributor pay are decided by markets; the docs describe project funds and token issuance as market-governed. | Unknown | |
| How is AI used? | No documented AI role in decision-making. | No documented AI role. | |
| What are the main risks? | Thin liquidity; manipulation of the average price; a few wallets dominating; markets reflect token price, not wider welfare. | Operates alongside US and Canadian governments, which limits its practical jurisdiction; its rule of unanimity within and between blocs requires broad agreement.CLM-0117CLM-0118 |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.