How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Founder-led: Noyes had final authority, with daily evening meetings, standing committees and departments running work and community business. | A 28-member General Council (half elected by parish, half by national list) elects the head of government; the co-princes sanction laws with countersignature. | Unknown | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Mutual criticism before the whole community or a committee, the subject listening without replying. Noyes wrote that persistent refusal led to withdrawal or expulsion. | A four-member Constitutional Tribunal appointed by the co-princes and the General Council; ordinary courts. | Unknown | |
| How are public goods funded? | Common property, shared dining, communal child care in a children's department, and industries supporting all members. | Health, education and infrastructure funded by indirect, corporate and personal taxes; parishes run local services. | Unknown | |
| How is AI used? | No documented AI role. | No specific role for AI. | Unknown | |
| What are the main risks? | Dependence on a charismatic leader; social control through criticism; limits on members' freedom to refuse sexual advances; the stirpiculture programme; external hostility; succession. | Clash between the episcopal co-prince and legislation such as abortion; exclusion of non-citizens; dependence on France, Spain and the EU. | Unknown |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.