Polity Atlas
DisputedSource attached · not independently reviewedCLM-0920 · as of 2026-10-27 · about: Legislature by lot · Author: Polity Atlas editorial team

“Lafont argues that lottocratic proposals, like epistocratic and deep-pluralist ones, are 'shortcuts' that would require citizens to defer blindly to decision-makers they cannot control, and would therefore undermine democracy.”

Evidence that supports

1

Evidence that contradicts

0

No counter-evidence recorded.

Status history

No earlier revisions.

Disputes

No disputes have been filed.

Dispute or add evidence

Submissions are reviewed by an editor and logged publicly on this claim. A source is required.

Your evidence
Not signed in — leave an email so an editor can follow up.