Polity Atlas
DisputedSource attached · not independently reviewedCLM-0277 · as of 2026-10-23 · about: Republican freedom as non-domination · Author: Polity Atlas editorial team

“Some philosophers (Goodin, Carter, Kramer) argue that talk of non-domination is another way of describing secure non-interference; Pettit rejects this because the method of securing low interference matters.”

Context. The dispute is conceptual: whether republican freedom is distinct from liberal negative liberty.

Evidence that supports

1

Evidence that contradicts

0

No counter-evidence recorded.

Status history

No earlier revisions.

Disputes

No disputes have been filed.

Dispute or add evidence

Submissions are reviewed by an editor and logged publicly on this claim. A source is required.

Your evidence
Not signed in — leave an email so an editor can follow up.