Polity Atlas
DisputedSource attached · not independently reviewedCLM-0186 · as of 2026-10-23 · about: Ranked-choice voting (instant-runoff) · Author: Polity Atlas editorial team

“Evidence that ranked-choice voting reduces polarisation or negative campaigning is mixed: survey work reports more civil campaigns under preferential voting, while studies of exhausted ballots and non-monotonic outcomes qualify claims of broader benefits.”

Context. Studies differ in cities, years and outcome measures.

Evidence that supports

1

Evidence that contradicts

1

Context

Single Transferable Vote: An Example of a Perverse Social Choice Function

Status history

No earlier revisions.

Disputes

No disputes have been filed.

Dispute or add evidence

Submissions are reviewed by an editor and logged publicly on this claim. A source is required.

Your evidence
Not signed in — leave an email so an editor can follow up.