Polity Atlas
Article

Did They Deliberate? Applying an Evaluative Model of Democratic Deliberation to the Oregon Citizens' Initiative Review

Katherine R. Knobloch; John Gastil; Justin Reedy; Katherine Cramer Walsh · Journal of Applied Communication Research 41(2), 105-125 · 2013

Open publisher page ↗
Type
Article
Author
Katherine R. Knobloch; John Gastil; Justin Reedy; Katherine Cramer Walsh
Identifier
DOI 10.1080/00909882.2012.760746
Accessed
2026-09-01

Claims citing this source

2 claims
TheoryEvaluations found that the Oregon review met a reasonable standard for democratic deliberation and that voters who read the panel's Citizens' Statement made better-informed decisions.EstablishedKnobloch and colleagues, applying an evaluative model of democratic deliberation to the Oregon CIR, concluded that it met a reasonable standard for democratic deliberation and identified design features that aided and detracted from its quality.