Idea
A matching fund for public goods: projects receive matching money proportional to the square of the sum of the square roots of individual contributions, so broad support counts more than a few large donations.
Theory
Buterin, Hitzig and Weyl (2019) show that, in theory, the rule funds public goods at efficient levels when a matching pool covers the gap.
Real examples
- Gitcoin has run quadratic-funding rounds for open-source software since 2019.
- Several blockchain ecosystems and civic projects have adopted variants.
Critique
Results depend on robust identity: one person splitting donations across accounts can capture matching funds. Matching pools must be refilled from outside, so the mechanism allocates subsidies rather than raising them.
Results
Quadratic funding has distributed real money to many small projects. Independent evaluation of whether it funds better projects than alternatives is limited.
Cost calculator
Budget: 100 voice credits4 votes cost 16 credits — 16% of the budget. 84 credits left for other issues.
Revision history
- 2026-10-23rev 2 — Seed import
- 2026-10-23rev 1 — Seed import