Polity Atlas
Mechanism · Alternative governance

Quadratic funding

A matching rule for public goods: projects receive matching funds that grow with the number of distinct contributors, not just the amount.

Source attached · not independently reviewedLast verified 2026-10-01 · revision 2 · 1 reviewersRevision historyЧитать на русском

Idea

A matching fund for public goods: projects receive matching money proportional to the square of the sum of the square roots of individual contributions, so broad support counts more than a few large donations.

Theory

Buterin, Hitzig and Weyl (2019) show that, in theory, the rule funds public goods at efficient levels when a matching pool covers the gap.

Real examples

  • Gitcoin has run quadratic-funding rounds for open-source software since 2019.
  • Several blockchain ecosystems and civic projects have adopted variants.

Critique

Results depend on robust identity: one person splitting donations across accounts can capture matching funds. Matching pools must be refilled from outside, so the mechanism allocates subsidies rather than raising them.

Results

Quadratic funding has distributed real money to many small projects. Independent evaluation of whether it funds better projects than alternatives is limited.

Cost calculator

Budget: 100 voice credits

4 votes cost 16 credits — 16% of the budget. 84 credits left for other issues.

Revision history

  1. 2026-10-23rev 2 — Seed import
  2. 2026-10-23rev 1 — Seed import