How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | The president and RPF leadership set policy; a consensual multiparty forum, a parliament that rarely challenges the executive, national plans and annual performance contracts (imihigo) for officials. | A stratified random sample of 523 voters deliberated in moderated groups and plenaries and answered questionnaires before and after; no decisions were taken.Sortition / citizens' assembly | Each listed body sets its own well-being objectives and steps; the Welsh Ministers publish national indicators and a future trends report after each election. | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Courts subordinate to the executive in political cases; community mediators (abunzi) for local disputes; gacaca courts for genocide crimes (2005–2012). | Balanced briefing materials, trained neutral moderators and competing experts structured disagreement. | The Commissioner may review a body and recommend; the body must take reasonable steps to follow or publish reasons (s 22). The Auditor General examines application of the principle. | |
| How are public goods funded? | Community health workers and near-universal health insurance, schooling, roads and electrification, financed by taxes, aid and RPF-linked investment companies. | Privately funded; produced published results, media coverage and a peer-reviewed study. | Covers the Welsh Ministers, local authorities, health boards, national park authorities and other listed bodies; public services boards plan locally. | |
| How is AI used? | Digitised public services and drone delivery of medical supplies; no algorithmic political decision-making is documented. | No AI role. | No documented AI role. | |
| What are the main risks? | Dependence on one leader and party, repression that removes feedback, aid dependence, regional conflict in eastern Congo, and unresolved grievances that cannot be voiced.CLM-1146 | Self-selection into attendance; artificial setting; analysis by the method's designers; no institutional uptake. | Soft 'follow or explain' enforcement; procedural compliance; difficulty measuring long-term and preventative benefits. |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.