How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | An association of hereditary citizens (Burger) meets to make rules, elect officials and set fines; officials allocate work and timber and supervise the alp.Popular assembly | A stratified random sample of 523 voters deliberated in moderated groups and plenaries and answered questionnaires before and after; no decisions were taken.Sortition / citizens' assembly | Unknown | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Mutual monitoring among households, inspections by elected officials and fines paid to the association; rules revised repeatedly by the users. | Balanced briefing materials, trained neutral moderators and competing experts structured disagreement. | Unknown | |
| How are public goods funded? | Summer grazing, firewood and timber, irrigation channels and paths maintained through compulsory labour days. | Privately funded; produced published results, media coverage and a peer-reviewed study. | Unknown | |
| How is AI used? | None. Monitoring and allocation rely on officials and mutual observation. | No AI role. | Unknown | |
| What are the main risks? | Depopulation, decline of mountain farming, exclusion of non-citizen residents and competing uses such as hydropower and tourism. | Self-selection into attendance; artificial setting; analysis by the method's designers; no institutional uptake. | Unknown |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.