How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | + Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | 22 independent members elected in constituencies; the whole legislature elects the Premier and ministers by secret ballot and can remove them. | A 28-member General Council (half elected by parish, half by national list) elects the head of government; the co-princes sanction laws with countersignature. | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Inside the assembly through questioning and non-confidence votes; land-claims disputes through arbitration and courts involving Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated and Canada. | A four-member Constitutional Tribunal appointed by the co-princes and the General Council; ordinary courts. | |
| How are public goods funded? | Health, education, housing and social services, financed mainly by federal transfers; co-management boards for wildlife and land use. | Health, education and infrastructure funded by indirect, corporate and personal taxes; parishes run local services. | |
| How is AI used? | No specific role for AI in the consensus system. | No specific role for AI. | |
| What are the main risks? | Fiscal dependence; weak programmatic accountability without parties; slow Inuit employment; housing and social crises.CLM-0428 | Clash between the episcopal co-prince and legislation such as abortion; exclusion of non-citizens; dependence on France, Spain and the EU. |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.