How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Provincial council elected by proportional representation; a provincial government whose composition must reflect the language groups; a vote by language group on bills a group considers harmful. | A stratified random sample of 523 voters deliberated in moderated groups and plenaries and answered questionnaires before and after; no decisions were taken.Sortition / citizens' assembly | Unknown | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Joint State-province commissions draft implementing decrees; disputes go to the Constitutional Court; Austria claims a protective role under the 1946 agreement. | Balanced briefing materials, trained neutral moderators and competing experts structured disagreement. | Unknown | |
| How are public goods funded? | Schools in each mother tongue, health, housing, transport and culture, financed by most of the tax revenue raised in the province. | Privately funded; produced published results, media coverage and a peer-reviewed study. | Unknown | |
| How is AI used? | No specific role for AI in the autonomy arrangement. | No AI role. | Unknown | |
| What are the main risks? | Hardening of ethnic categories through Proporz; separation of language communities; erosion of competences by central law and courts. | Self-selection into attendance; artificial setting; analysis by the method's designers; no institutional uptake. | Unknown |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.