How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | + Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | A federal assembly of delegates from about 23 cities, with three, two or one votes per city by size; it elected the Lyciarch and federal officials. | A 28-member General Council (half elected by parish, half by national list) elects the head of government; the co-princes sanction laws with countersignature. | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Federal courts with judges drawn from cities in proportion to their votes; treaties with Rome regulated external jurisdiction. | A four-member Constitutional Tribunal appointed by the co-princes and the General Council; ordinary courts. | |
| How are public goods funded? | Federal cults and sanctuaries, coinage and courts, financed by contributions proportional to votes; later, benefactions by wealthy Lyciarchs. | Health, education and infrastructure funded by indirect, corporate and personal taxes; parishes run local services. | |
| How is AI used? | None; an ancient federation. | No specific role for AI. | |
| What are the main risks? | Elite domination of city delegations, dependence on Rome for security and foreign policy, and annexation. | Clash between the episcopal co-prince and legislation such as abortion; exclusion of non-citizens; dependence on France, Spain and the EU. |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.