How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | + Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Elected federal and unit governments with constitutionally divided powers and a second chamber representing the units. | A stratified random sample of 523 voters deliberated in moderated groups and plenaries and answered questionnaires before and after; no decisions were taken.Sortition / citizens' assembly | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Constitutional or supreme court as umpire; intergovernmental councils. | Balanced briefing materials, trained neutral moderators and competing experts structured disagreement. | |
| How are public goods funded? | Divided by level, with fiscal transfers and equalisation between richer and poorer units. | Privately funded; produced published results, media coverage and a peer-reviewed study. | |
| How is AI used? | No inherent AI role; units can experiment with different digital-government policies. | No AI role. | |
| What are the main risks? | Gridlock, unequal rights across units, bailout-driven overspending and ethnofederal break-up. | Self-selection into attendance; artificial setting; analysis by the method's designers; no institutional uptake. |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.