How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Proposals pass or fail by comparing the time-weighted average price of the token in conditional pass and fail markets; no token vote.Futarchy | The Prime Minister is formally responsible for Diella; the Constitutional Court states AI cannot change who exercises public power or bears accountability. | Unknown | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | No court; contested outcomes are settled by the market result, with protocol fixes after incidents. | Opposition challenged the decrees before the Constitutional Court, which dismissed the request on 8 October 2026; its full reasoning is pending. | Unknown | |
| How are public goods funded? | Treasury spending and contributor pay are decided by markets; the docs describe project funds and token issuance as market-governed. | Aims to improve public-service access and reduce discretion in public procurement. | Unknown | |
| How is AI used? | No documented AI role in decision-making. | Chatbot and voice assistant on e-Albania; a procurement system tender was still being prepared in August 2026. | Unknown | |
| What are the main risks? | Thin liquidity; manipulation of the average price; a few wallets dominating; markets reflect token price, not wider welfare. | Unclear accountability for an AI 'minister'; no AI law yet; no published technical detail; AKSHI's leaders face a tender-rigging case.CLM-0359 | Unknown |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.