How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | + Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Proposals pass or fail by comparing the time-weighted average price of the token in conditional pass and fail markets; no token vote.Futarchy | Communes and elected councils at neighbourhood, district, canton and inter-region levels; co-chairs and a 40% minimum quota for either sex (Rojava Information Center).Popular assembly | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | No court; contested outcomes are settled by the market result, with protocol fixes after incidents. | Commune reconciliation committees; regional Justice Councils administer tribunals and coordinate sentencing guidelines (Rojava Information Center). | |
| How are public goods funded? | Treasury spending and contributor pay are decided by markets; the docs describe project funds and token issuance as market-governed. | Regional offices and commissions for health, economy and natural resources; the administration controlled the area's oil extraction until integration (Crisis Group). | |
| How is AI used? | No documented AI role in decision-making. | No documented AI role. | |
| What are the main risks? | Thin liquidity; manipulation of the average price; a few wallets dominating; markets reflect token price, not wider welfare. | Turkish military action; reliance on external security partners; documented displacement abuses; contested terms of integration with Damascus.CLM-0279CLM-0280 |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.