How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Founder-led: Noyes had final authority, with daily evening meetings, standing committees and departments running work and community business. | A stratified random sample of 523 voters deliberated in moderated groups and plenaries and answered questionnaires before and after; no decisions were taken.Sortition / citizens' assembly | Unknown | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Mutual criticism before the whole community or a committee, the subject listening without replying. Noyes wrote that persistent refusal led to withdrawal or expulsion. | Balanced briefing materials, trained neutral moderators and competing experts structured disagreement. | Unknown | |
| How are public goods funded? | Common property, shared dining, communal child care in a children's department, and industries supporting all members. | Privately funded; produced published results, media coverage and a peer-reviewed study. | Unknown | |
| How is AI used? | No documented AI role. | No AI role. | Unknown | |
| What are the main risks? | Dependence on a charismatic leader; social control through criticism; limits on members' freedom to refuse sexual advances; the stirpiculture programme; external hostility; succession. | Self-selection into attendance; artificial setting; analysis by the method's designers; no institutional uptake. | Unknown |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.