Polity Atlas
Mechanism · Real-world experiments

Participatory budgeting

Residents directly decide how to spend part of a public budget through proposals, deliberation and votes.

Source attached · not independently reviewedLast verified 2026-10-01 · revision 2 · 1 reviewersRevision historyЧитать на русском

Idea

Residents decide directly how to spend part of a public budget, through assemblies, proposals and votes.

Theory

Participatory budgeting aims to redistribute investment toward neglected areas, educate citizens and reduce clientelism. Brian Wampler's comparative work shows outcomes depend heavily on mayoral support and on how much money is at stake.

Real examples

  • Porto Alegre introduced it in 1989.
  • Paris, New York City and many other cities run annual cycles.
  • Kerala's People's Plan Campaign (1996) devolved planning to local bodies.

Critique

When the share of the budget is small, participation can be symbolic. Turnout is often uneven, and the process can be captured by organised groups or abandoned by new administrations.

Results

Thousands of municipalities have adopted some version. Evidence of redistribution is strongest where substantial funds and political commitment are involved.

Claims

EstablishedCLM-0048 · checked 2026-10-23

Participatory budgeting spread from Porto Alegre to many municipalities in Latin America, Europe and elsewhere.[1]

Revision history

  1. 2026-10-23rev 2 — Seed import
  2. 2026-10-23rev 1 — Seed import