Polity Atlas

How each model solves the same problems

Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.

Question✕✕✕
How are decisions made?An unelected Leader with appointment powers over courts, media and half the Guardian Council; an elected president and parliament whose candidates are vetted; the Expediency Council arbitrates.Power concentrated in the party centre and in Xi Jinping as 'core'; central commissions chaired by Xi; presidential term limits removed in 2018; party bodies absorbed government functions.A stratified random sample of 523 voters deliberated in moderated groups and plenaries and answered questionnaires before and after; no decisions were taken.Sortition / citizens' assembly
How are conflicts resolved?The Leader's arbitration among factions; the Expediency Council between parliament and the Guardian Council; revolutionary courts for political cases.Party discipline commissions and supervisory commissions with extrajudicial detention (liuzhi); courts under party leadership; online petition and complaint platforms.Balanced briefing materials, trained neutral moderators and competing experts structured disagreement.
How are public goods funded?Oil-funded subsidies, health, education and social insurance; foundations (bonyads) and IRGC firms provide services and patronage; sanctions constrain provision.State-led industrial policy, poverty-alleviation campaigns, infrastructure; local governments squeezed by debt and reduced land revenue.Privately funded; produced published results, media coverage and a peer-reviewed study.
How is AI used?No algorithmic governance documented; authorities use surveillance cameras and digital tools to enforce hijab rules and track protesters, and impose internet shutdowns.AI-enabled surveillance (facial recognition, big-data policing, IJOP in Xinjiang); algorithmic routing of citizen complaints.No AI role.
What are the main risks?War and external strikes, a contested succession, economic crisis under sanctions, shrinking electoral participation, and lethal repression of protest.Unchecked personal power and succession uncertainty, mass repression in Xinjiang and Tibet, surveillance, reduced local initiative, and policy errors without public correction.CLM-1095Self-selection into attendance; artificial setting; analysis by the method's designers; no institutional uptake.

This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.