Polity Atlas

How each model solves the same problems

Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.

Question✕✕✕
How are decisions made?An unelected Leader with appointment powers over courts, media and half the Guardian Council; an elected president and parliament whose candidates are vetted; the Expediency Council arbitrates.The Prime Minister is formally responsible for Diella; the Constitutional Court states AI cannot change who exercises public power or bears accountability.A stratified random sample of 523 voters deliberated in moderated groups and plenaries and answered questionnaires before and after; no decisions were taken.Sortition / citizens' assembly
How are conflicts resolved?The Leader's arbitration among factions; the Expediency Council between parliament and the Guardian Council; revolutionary courts for political cases.Opposition challenged the decrees before the Constitutional Court, which dismissed the request on 8 October 2026; its full reasoning is pending.Balanced briefing materials, trained neutral moderators and competing experts structured disagreement.
How are public goods funded?Oil-funded subsidies, health, education and social insurance; foundations (bonyads) and IRGC firms provide services and patronage; sanctions constrain provision.Aims to improve public-service access and reduce discretion in public procurement.Privately funded; produced published results, media coverage and a peer-reviewed study.
How is AI used?No algorithmic governance documented; authorities use surveillance cameras and digital tools to enforce hijab rules and track protesters, and impose internet shutdowns.Chatbot and voice assistant on e-Albania; a procurement system tender was still being prepared in August 2026.No AI role.
What are the main risks?War and external strikes, a contested succession, economic crisis under sanctions, shrinking electoral participation, and lethal repression of protest.Unclear accountability for an AI 'minister'; no AI law yet; no published technical detail; AKSHI's leaders face a tender-rigging case.CLM-0359Self-selection into attendance; artificial setting; analysis by the method's designers; no institutional uptake.

This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.