Polity Atlas

How each model solves the same problems

Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.

Question✕✕✕
How are decisions made?Politburo of the Communist Party under a general secretary who was first among equals; the Central Committee confirmed leaders and could remove them; ministries and Gosplan ran the economy.Kings of small kingdoms (túatha) under over-kings; assemblies (óenach); customary law expounded by hereditary jurists rather than legislated.Power concentrated in the party centre and in Xi Jinping as 'core'; central commissions chaired by Xi; presidential term limits removed in 2018; party bodies absorbed government functions.
How are conflicts resolved?Bargaining inside the Politburo and the apparatus; courts and the KGB under party direction for society; no independent judiciary.Brehon judges; sureties (naidm, ráth, aitire); distraint of livestock; ritual fasting against higher-ranking defendants; body-fines and honour-price compensation.ArbitrationParty discipline commissions and supervisory commissions with extrajudicial detention (liuzhi); courts under party leadership; online petition and complaint platforms.
How are public goods funded?Guaranteed employment, subsidised housing, food and transport, free education and health care, financed from the plan and from the 1970s by oil exports.Rules on shared grazing, co-operative ploughing, mills and fencing; obligatory hospitality; churches and monasteries; few public works.State-led industrial policy, poverty-alleviation campaigns, infrastructure; local governments squeezed by debt and reduced land revenue.
How is AI used?None; computerised planning (OGAS) was proposed but not built at scale.None; a medieval legal order.AI-enabled surveillance (facial recognition, big-data policing, IJOP in Xinjiang); algorithmic routing of citizen complaints.
What are the main risks?Gerontocracy and immobility, falling growth hidden by distorted statistics, dependence on oil prices, and repression of the critics who could have signalled problems.Status-graded and unequal protection, unfree labour, endemic raiding and dynastic war, and vulnerability to a centralising conqueror.CLM-0385Unchecked personal power and succession uncertainty, mass repression in Xinjiang and Tibet, surveillance, reduced local initiative, and policy errors without public correction.CLM-1095

This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.