How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | + Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Politburo of the Communist Party under a general secretary who was first among equals; the Central Committee confirmed leaders and could remove them; ministries and Gosplan ran the economy. | Kings of small kingdoms (túatha) under over-kings; assemblies (óenach); customary law expounded by hereditary jurists rather than legislated. | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Bargaining inside the Politburo and the apparatus; courts and the KGB under party direction for society; no independent judiciary. | Brehon judges; sureties (naidm, ráth, aitire); distraint of livestock; ritual fasting against higher-ranking defendants; body-fines and honour-price compensation.Arbitration | |
| How are public goods funded? | Guaranteed employment, subsidised housing, food and transport, free education and health care, financed from the plan and from the 1970s by oil exports. | Rules on shared grazing, co-operative ploughing, mills and fencing; obligatory hospitality; churches and monasteries; few public works. | |
| How is AI used? | None; computerised planning (OGAS) was proposed but not built at scale. | None; a medieval legal order. | |
| What are the main risks? | Gerontocracy and immobility, falling growth hidden by distorted statistics, dependence on oil prices, and repression of the critics who could have signalled problems. | Status-graded and unequal protection, unfree labour, endemic raiding and dynastic war, and vulnerability to a centralising conqueror.CLM-0385 |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.