Polity Atlas

How each model solves the same problems

Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.

Question✕✕✕
How are decisions made?Party congress, Central Committee and Politburo; power shared among general secretary, president, prime minister and National Assembly chair; Assembly elections with more candidates than seats, vetted by the Fatherland Front.A statutory authority (UIDAI) under the central government sets rules; ministries decide where Aadhaar is required; Parliament legislated in 2016 and 2019.Digital identityA stratified random sample of 523 voters deliberated in moderated groups and plenaries and answered questionnaires before and after; no decisions were taken.Sortition / citizens' assembly
How are conflicts resolved?Party inspection commissions, courts under party leadership, citizen petitions; prosecutions of critics under national-security articles of the penal code.Grievance channels at UIDAI and service agencies; constitutional challenges in the Supreme Court, which ruled in 2017 and 2018.Balanced briefing materials, trained neutral moderators and competing experts structured disagreement.
How are public goods funded?State budget and state enterprises with growing private and foreign investment; provincial governments deliver services, measured annually by the PAPI survey.A universal, low-cost proof of identity used for welfare transfers, financial inclusion and public services.Privately funded; produced published results, media coverage and a peer-reviewed study.
How is AI used?No significant AI role in governance; e-government services are expanding.No AI in decision-making as such; automated biometric matching and deduplication decide authentication, and face authentication was added in 2018.No AI role.
What are the main risks?Corruption and cronyism, concentration of power through anti-corruption campaigns, repression of dissent, and inequality linked to access to party-state networks.Exclusion through authentication failures, data leaks, surveillance and profiling, weak independent oversight and function creep.CLM-0544Self-selection into attendance; artificial setting; analysis by the method's designers; no institutional uptake.

This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.