Polity Atlas

How each model solves the same problems

Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.

Question✕✕✕
How are decisions made?Party congress, Central Committee and Politburo; power shared among general secretary, president, prime minister and National Assembly chair; Assembly elections with more candidates than seats, vetted by the Fatherland Front.Grand Council of 50 chiefs chosen by clan mothers; questions pass between groups of nations, each seeking unanimity, with the Onondaga Firekeepers confirming or resolving disagreement.A stratified random sample of 523 voters deliberated in moderated groups and plenaries and answered questionnaires before and after; no decisions were taken.Sortition / citizens' assembly
How are conflicts resolved?Party inspection commissions, courts under party leadership, citizen petitions; prosecutions of critics under national-security articles of the penal code.The Confederacy describes the Grand Council as resolving disputes among the nations and planning for the welfare of all the people.Balanced briefing materials, trained neutral moderators and competing experts structured disagreement.
How are public goods funded?State budget and state enterprises with growing private and foreign investment; provincial governments deliver services, measured annually by the PAPI survey.UnknownPrivately funded; produced published results, media coverage and a peer-reviewed study.
How is AI used?No significant AI role in governance; e-government services are expanding.No documented AI role.No AI role.
What are the main risks?Corruption and cronyism, concentration of power through anti-corruption campaigns, repression of dissent, and inequality linked to access to party-state networks.Operates alongside US and Canadian governments, which limits its practical jurisdiction; its rule of unanimity within and between blocs requires broad agreement.CLM-0117CLM-0118Self-selection into attendance; artificial setting; analysis by the method's designers; no institutional uptake.

This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.