Polity Atlas

How each model solves the same problems

Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.

Question✕✕✕
How are decisions made?Developers decide by general resolution and elect a Project Leader annually; a Technical Committee of up to eight decides technical disputes; ranked voting with a default option.Condorcet methodsA 28-member General Council (half elected by parish, half by national list) elects the head of government; the co-princes sanction laws with countersignature.The Prime Minister is formally responsible for Diella; the Constitutional Court states AI cannot change who exercises public power or bears accountability.
How are conflicts resolved?Technical Committee rulings, overridable by developers with a 2:1 majority; the Project Secretary interprets the constitution.A four-member Constitutional Tribunal appointed by the co-princes and the General Council; ordinary courts.Opposition challenged the decrees before the Constitutional Court, which dismissed the request on 8 October 2026; its full reasoning is pending.
How are public goods funded?A free operating system maintained by volunteers; assets held by Trusted Organisations such as Software in the Public Interest.Health, education and infrastructure funded by indirect, corporate and personal taxes; parishes run local services.Aims to improve public-service access and reduce discretion in public procurement.
How is AI used?None in governance; decisions are by human votes and committees.No specific role for AI.Chatbot and voice assistant on e-Albania; a procurement system tender was still being prepared in August 2026.
What are the main risks?Volunteer burnout, slow decisions, bitter disputes leading to resignations and forks, and dependence on a small active core.Clash between the episcopal co-prince and legislation such as abortion; exclusion of non-citizens; dependence on France, Spain and the EU.Unclear accountability for an AI 'minister'; no AI law yet; no published technical detail; AKSHI's leaders face a tender-rigging case.CLM-0359

This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.