How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | + Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Developers decide by general resolution and elect a Project Leader annually; a Technical Committee of up to eight decides technical disputes; ranked voting with a default option.Condorcet methods | Kings of small kingdoms (túatha) under over-kings; assemblies (óenach); customary law expounded by hereditary jurists rather than legislated. | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Technical Committee rulings, overridable by developers with a 2:1 majority; the Project Secretary interprets the constitution. | Brehon judges; sureties (naidm, ráth, aitire); distraint of livestock; ritual fasting against higher-ranking defendants; body-fines and honour-price compensation.Arbitration | |
| How are public goods funded? | A free operating system maintained by volunteers; assets held by Trusted Organisations such as Software in the Public Interest. | Rules on shared grazing, co-operative ploughing, mills and fencing; obligatory hospitality; churches and monasteries; few public works. | |
| How is AI used? | None in governance; decisions are by human votes and committees. | None; a medieval legal order. | |
| What are the main risks? | Volunteer burnout, slow decisions, bitter disputes leading to resignations and forks, and dependence on a small active core. | Status-graded and unequal protection, unfree labour, endemic raiding and dynastic war, and vulnerability to a centralising conqueror.CLM-0385 |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.