How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | An association of hereditary citizens (Burger) meets to make rules, elect officials and set fines; officials allocate work and timber and supervise the alp.Popular assembly | Kings of small kingdoms (túatha) under over-kings; assemblies (óenach); customary law expounded by hereditary jurists rather than legislated. | Unknown | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Mutual monitoring among households, inspections by elected officials and fines paid to the association; rules revised repeatedly by the users. | Brehon judges; sureties (naidm, ráth, aitire); distraint of livestock; ritual fasting against higher-ranking defendants; body-fines and honour-price compensation.Arbitration | Unknown | |
| How are public goods funded? | Summer grazing, firewood and timber, irrigation channels and paths maintained through compulsory labour days. | Rules on shared grazing, co-operative ploughing, mills and fencing; obligatory hospitality; churches and monasteries; few public works. | Unknown | |
| How is AI used? | None. Monitoring and allocation rely on officials and mutual observation. | None; a medieval legal order. | Unknown | |
| What are the main risks? | Depopulation, decline of mountain farming, exclusion of non-citizen residents and competing uses such as hydropower and tourism. | Status-graded and unequal protection, unfree labour, endemic raiding and dynastic war, and vulnerability to a centralising conqueror.CLM-0385 | Unknown |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.