How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Residents and groups propose care or regeneration of a commons; the city negotiates a written collaboration pact setting goals, duties and resources. | The Prime Minister is formally responsible for Diella; the Constitutional Court states AI cannot change who exercises public power or bears accountability. | Unknown | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Pacts specify responsibilities and reporting; disputes are handled by negotiation with the city's coordinating office. | Opposition challenged the decrees before the Constitutional Court, which dismissed the request on 8 October 2026; its full reasoning is pending. | Unknown | |
| How are public goods funded? | Unpaid civic work combined with city-supplied materials, insurance and fee relief maintains and regenerates public spaces and buildings. | Aims to improve public-service access and reduce discretion in public procurement. | Unknown | |
| How is AI used? | No AI role. | Chatbot and voice assistant on e-Albania; a procurement system tender was still being prepared in August 2026. | Unknown | |
| What are the main risks? | Volunteers substituting for paid public services; uneven capacity across neighbourhoods; exclusion of users who are not party to a pact. | Unclear accountability for an AI 'minister'; no AI law yet; no published technical detail; AKSHI's leaders face a tender-rigging case.CLM-0359 | Unknown |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.