How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Residents and groups propose care or regeneration of a commons; the city negotiates a written collaboration pact setting goals, duties and resources. | Unknown | A 28-member General Council (half elected by parish, half by national list) elects the head of government; the co-princes sanction laws with countersignature. | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Pacts specify responsibilities and reporting; disputes are handled by negotiation with the city's coordinating office. | Unknown | A four-member Constitutional Tribunal appointed by the co-princes and the General Council; ordinary courts. | |
| How are public goods funded? | Unpaid civic work combined with city-supplied materials, insurance and fee relief maintains and regenerates public spaces and buildings. | Unknown | Health, education and infrastructure funded by indirect, corporate and personal taxes; parishes run local services. | |
| How is AI used? | No AI role. | Unknown | No specific role for AI. | |
| What are the main risks? | Volunteers substituting for paid public services; uneven capacity across neighbourhoods; exclusion of users who are not party to a pact. | Unknown | Clash between the episcopal co-prince and legislation such as abortion; exclusion of non-citizens; dependence on France, Spain and the EU. |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.