Polity Atlas

How each model solves the same problems

Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.

Question✕✕✕
How are decisions made?Online petitions with signature thresholds, a city-wide survey and collaborative editing fed a 30-member drafting group; a 100-member partly appointed assembly adopted the text by qualified majority.Communes and elected councils at neighbourhood, district, canton and inter-region levels; co-chairs and a 40% minimum quota for either sex (Rojava Information Center).Popular assemblyA stratified random sample of 523 voters deliberated in moderated groups and plenaries and answered questionnaires before and after; no decisions were taken.Sortition / citizens' assembly
How are conflicts resolved?Signature thresholds guaranteed graduated responses; disputes over the final text were settled in the assembly and later before the Supreme Court.Commune reconciliation committees; regional Justice Councils administer tribunals and coordinate sentencing guidelines (Rojava Information Center).Balanced briefing materials, trained neutral moderators and competing experts structured disagreement.
How are public goods funded?A low-cost online platform; the resulting constitution enshrines rights to the city, a healthy environment and indigenous rights.Regional offices and commissions for health, economy and natural resources; the administration controlled the area's oil extraction until integration (Crisis Group).Privately funded; produced published results, media coverage and a peer-reviewed study.
How is AI used?No AI role.No documented AI role.No AI role.
What are the main risks?Digital divide; organisers' own metrics of influence; partly appointed assembly; petitions favouring organised campaigns.CLM-0484Turkish military action; reliance on external security partners; documented displacement abuses; contested terms of integration with Damascus.CLM-0279CLM-0280Self-selection into attendance; artificial setting; analysis by the method's designers; no institutional uptake.

This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.