How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | 160 residents aged 16+, drawn by public lottery, set priorities and adopted recommendations by more than 50% of votes, then ranked them.Sortition / citizens' assembly | Kings of small kingdoms (túatha) under over-kings; assemblies (óenach); customary law expounded by hereditary jurists rather than legislated. | Unknown | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Content-neutral moderation, a party-nominated scientific board and a stakeholder hearing; rival proposals were put to separate votes. | Brehon judges; sureties (naidm, ráth, aitire); distraint of livestock; ritual fasting against higher-ranking defendants; body-fines and honour-price compensation.Arbitration | Unknown | |
| How are public goods funded? | Bundestag-funded with allowances of €100 per in-person day; recommendations carry fiscal implications such as free school lunches and an animal-welfare levy. | Rules on shared grazing, co-operative ploughing, mills and fencing; obligatory hospitality; churches and monasteries; few public works. | Unknown | |
| How is AI used? | No AI role. | None; a medieval legal order. | Unknown | |
| What are the main risks? | Association with one parliamentary majority; non-binding status; follow-up interrupted by the end of the electoral term. | Status-graded and unequal protection, unfree labour, endemic raiding and dynastic war, and vulnerability to a centralising conqueror.CLM-0385 | Unknown |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.