How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | + Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | 160 residents aged 16+, drawn by public lottery, set priorities and adopted recommendations by more than 50% of votes, then ranked them.Sortition / citizens' assembly | The Prime Minister is formally responsible for Diella; the Constitutional Court states AI cannot change who exercises public power or bears accountability. | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Content-neutral moderation, a party-nominated scientific board and a stakeholder hearing; rival proposals were put to separate votes. | Opposition challenged the decrees before the Constitutional Court, which dismissed the request on 8 October 2026; its full reasoning is pending. | |
| How are public goods funded? | Bundestag-funded with allowances of €100 per in-person day; recommendations carry fiscal implications such as free school lunches and an animal-welfare levy. | Aims to improve public-service access and reduce discretion in public procurement. | |
| How is AI used? | No AI role. | Chatbot and voice assistant on e-Albania; a procurement system tender was still being prepared in August 2026. | |
| What are the main risks? | Association with one parliamentary majority; non-binding status; follow-up interrupted by the end of the electoral term. | Unclear accountability for an AI 'minister'; no AI law yet; no published technical detail; AKSHI's leaders face a tender-rigging case.CLM-0359 |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.