How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | + Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | 108 members chosen by civic lottery heard experts and voted by secret ballot, mostly in thematic groups, on options for reaching net zero.Sortition / citizens' assembly | Each listed body sets its own well-being objectives and steps; the Welsh Ministers publish national indicators and a future trends report after each election. | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Professional facilitation, balanced expert leads, secret ballots recording levels of support; no formal channel for disputes with government. | The Commissioner may review a body and recommend; the body must take reasonable steps to follow or publish reasons (s 22). The Auditor General examines application of the principle. | |
| How are public goods funded? | Funded by the House of Commons (£120,000) and two foundations (£220,000 each); produced a public record of informed citizens' preferences on net-zero trade-offs. | Covers the Welsh Ministers, local authorities, health boards, national park authorities and other listed bodies; public services boards plan locally. | |
| How is AI used? | No AI role. | No documented AI role. | |
| What are the main risks? | No duty on government to respond; remit too broad for six weekends; agenda set by organisers rather than members. | Soft 'follow or explain' enforcement; procedural compliance; difficulty measuring long-term and preventative benefits. |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.