How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | + Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | A 60-member Grand and General Council elected by proportional representation; two Captains Regent elected every six months; a Congress of State as government; frequent referendums.Initiative and referendum | Kings of small kingdoms (túatha) under over-kings; assemblies (óenach); customary law expounded by hereditary jurists rather than legislated. | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Ordinary courts and a guarantor body on the constitutionality of laws; the Regency Syndicate hears complaints about former Regents. | Brehon judges; sureties (naidm, ráth, aitire); distraint of livestock; ritual fasting against higher-ranking defendants; body-fines and honour-price compensation.Arbitration | |
| How are public goods funded? | Health care, pensions, schools and infrastructure funded by taxes and contributions; defence and much of the economy depend on Italy. | Rules on shared grazing, co-operative ploughing, mills and fencing; obligatory hospitality; churches and monasteries; few public works. | |
| How is AI used? | No specific role for AI. | None; a medieval legal order. | |
| What are the main risks? | Conflicts of interest in a very small elite; corruption; economic dependence on Italy and on the EU's terms. | Status-graded and unequal protection, unfree labour, endemic raiding and dynastic war, and vulnerability to a centralising conqueror.CLM-0385 |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.