How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | + Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | A 24-delegate council elected by district, a directly elected President with a line-item veto, and 110 local chapters.Initiative and referendum | Kings of small kingdoms (túatha) under over-kings; assemblies (óenach); customary law expounded by hereditary jurists rather than legislated. | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | District courts and the Navajo Nation Supreme Court applying Navajo common law, plus a Peacemaker programme of consensual traditional resolution. | Brehon judges; sureties (naidm, ráth, aitire); distraint of livestock; ritual fasting against higher-ranking defendants; body-fines and honour-price compensation.Arbitration | |
| How are public goods funded? | Roads, utilities, police, schools and social services, funded by federal programmes, resource royalties, gaming and enterprises. | Rules on shared grazing, co-operative ploughing, mills and fencing; obligatory hospitality; churches and monasteries; few public works. | |
| How is AI used? | No specific role for AI. | None; a medieval legal order. | |
| What are the main risks? | Federal limits on jurisdiction and water; loss of coal revenue; corruption scandals; poverty and infrastructure gaps. | Status-graded and unequal protection, unfree labour, endemic raiding and dynastic war, and vulnerability to a centralising conqueror.CLM-0385 |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.