How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Irregular diets of town delegates deciding by agreement, recorded in recesses binding in practice only on consenting towns; regional diets; self-governing kontore abroad. | The Prime Minister is formally responsible for Diella; the Constitutional Court states AI cannot change who exercises public power or bears accountability. | Unknown | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Kontor courts with appeal to Lübeck; arbitration between towns by neighbours or diets; embargoes and exclusion of members as sanctions.Arbitration | Opposition challenged the decrees before the Constitutional Court, which dismissed the request on 8 October 2026; its full reasoning is pending. | Unknown | |
| How are public goods funded? | Collective trading privileges, merchants' courts abroad, shared urban law, convoys against pirates; financed ad hoc by member towns. | Aims to improve public-service access and reduce discretion in public procurement. | Unknown | |
| How is AI used? | None; a medieval network. | Chatbot and voice assistant on e-Albania; a procurement system tender was still being prepared in August 2026. | Unknown | |
| What are the main risks? | Free-riding and opt-outs by member towns, monopoly privileges that harmed outsiders, defence of oligarchic town councils, and stronger territorial states.CLM-0374 | Unclear accountability for an AI 'minister'; no AI law yet; no published technical detail; AKSHI's leaders face a tender-rigging case.CLM-0359 | Unknown |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.