How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Irregular diets of town delegates deciding by agreement, recorded in recesses binding in practice only on consenting towns; regional diets; self-governing kontore abroad. | Each listed body sets its own well-being objectives and steps; the Welsh Ministers publish national indicators and a future trends report after each election. | Unknown | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Kontor courts with appeal to Lübeck; arbitration between towns by neighbours or diets; embargoes and exclusion of members as sanctions.Arbitration | The Commissioner may review a body and recommend; the body must take reasonable steps to follow or publish reasons (s 22). The Auditor General examines application of the principle. | Unknown | |
| How are public goods funded? | Collective trading privileges, merchants' courts abroad, shared urban law, convoys against pirates; financed ad hoc by member towns. | Covers the Welsh Ministers, local authorities, health boards, national park authorities and other listed bodies; public services boards plan locally. | Unknown | |
| How is AI used? | None; a medieval network. | No documented AI role. | Unknown | |
| What are the main risks? | Free-riding and opt-outs by member towns, monopoly privileges that harmed outsiders, defence of oligarchic town councils, and stronger territorial states.CLM-0374 | Soft 'follow or explain' enforcement; procedural compliance; difficulty measuring long-term and preventative benefits. | Unknown |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.