How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | + Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Town assembly (veche) summoned by bell, plus district assemblies; elected posadniks and tysiatskii; an elected archbishop; princes bound by sworn contracts.Popular assemblySortition / citizens' assembly | A stratified random sample of 523 voters deliberated in moderated groups and plenaries and answered questionnaires before and after; no decisions were taken.Sortition / citizens' assembly | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Joint courts of prince and posadnik, commercial courts under the tysiatskii, archiepiscopal mediation; frequent factional street fighting. | Balanced briefing materials, trained neutral moderators and competing experts structured disagreement. | |
| How are public goods funded? | Paving, churches and defences funded by districts, the church and boyar patrons; merchant guilds regulated measures; no permanent bureaucracy. | Privately funded; produced published results, media coverage and a peer-reviewed study. | |
| How is AI used? | None; a medieval polity. | No AI role. | |
| What are the main risks? | Boyar oligarchy, factional violence in an assembly without fixed rules, dependence on grain imports, and absorption by Moscow.CLM-0363 | Self-selection into attendance; artificial setting; analysis by the method's designers; no institutional uptake. |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.