How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Town assembly (veche) summoned by bell, plus district assemblies; elected posadniks and tysiatskii; an elected archbishop; princes bound by sworn contracts.Popular assemblySortition / citizens' assembly | The Prime Minister is formally responsible for Diella; the Constitutional Court states AI cannot change who exercises public power or bears accountability. | Unknown | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Joint courts of prince and posadnik, commercial courts under the tysiatskii, archiepiscopal mediation; frequent factional street fighting. | Opposition challenged the decrees before the Constitutional Court, which dismissed the request on 8 October 2026; its full reasoning is pending. | Unknown | |
| How are public goods funded? | Paving, churches and defences funded by districts, the church and boyar patrons; merchant guilds regulated measures; no permanent bureaucracy. | Aims to improve public-service access and reduce discretion in public procurement. | Unknown | |
| How is AI used? | None; a medieval polity. | Chatbot and voice assistant on e-Albania; a procurement system tender was still being prepared in August 2026. | Unknown | |
| What are the main risks? | Boyar oligarchy, factional violence in an assembly without fixed rules, dependence on grain imports, and absorption by Moscow.CLM-0363 | Unclear accountability for an AI 'minister'; no AI law yet; no published technical detail; AKSHI's leaders face a tender-rigging case.CLM-0359 | Unknown |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.