How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | Historically assemblies and councils of citizens with short-term magistrates; today ranges from parliamentary democracy to dominant-party rule. | Unknown | A 28-member General Council (half elected by parish, half by national list) elects the head of government; the co-princes sanction laws with countersignature. | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Civic courts and councils; external disputes through leagues, alliances or larger powers. | Unknown | A four-member Constitutional Tribunal appointed by the co-princes and the General Council; ordinary courts. | |
| How are public goods funded? | Defence, port and market infrastructure, urban services, funded by trade and commercial taxation. | Unknown | Health, education and infrastructure funded by indirect, corporate and personal taxes; parishes run local services. | |
| How is AI used? | No inherent AI role; modern city-states such as Singapore invest heavily in digital government. | Unknown | No specific role for AI. | |
| What are the main risks? | Exclusive citizenship, factional strife, elite capture and vulnerability to larger states. | Unknown | Clash between the episcopal co-prince and legislation such as abortion; exclusion of non-citizens; dependence on France, Spain and the EU. |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.