Polity Atlas

How each model solves the same problems

Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.

Question✕✕✕
How are decisions made?Jurors are drawn in proportion to staked PNK, vote on evidence, and the majority decides; losing parties can appeal to larger juries.A 28-member General Council (half elected by parish, half by national list) elects the head of government; the co-princes sanction laws with countersignature.A stratified random sample of 523 voters deliberated in moderated groups and plenaries and answered questionnaires before and after; no decisions were taken.Sortition / citizens' assembly
How are conflicts resolved?Online evidence submission, juror vote and multi-round appeals; the ruling is executed by smart contract.ArbitrationA four-member Constitutional Tribunal appointed by the co-princes and the General Council; ordinary courts.Balanced briefing materials, trained neutral moderators and competing experts structured disagreement.
How are public goods funded?Funded by arbitration fees paid by the parties and by token incentives.Health, education and infrastructure funded by indirect, corporate and personal taxes; parishes run local services.Privately funded; produced published results, media coverage and a peer-reviewed study.
How is AI used?Core rulings are by human jurors; Kleros reports experiments with AI participants in curation courts.No specific role for AI.No AI role.
What are the main risks?Stake-weighted selection favours large holders; collusion or bribery; enforcement beyond the chain depends on state recognition.Clash between the episcopal co-prince and legislation such as abortion; exclusion of non-citizens; dependence on France, Spain and the EU.Self-selection into attendance; artificial setting; analysis by the method's designers; no institutional uptake.

This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.