How each model solves the same problems
Instead of “democracy versus anarchism”, compare the concrete ways collective problems get solved.
| Question | + Model | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| How are decisions made? | A lot-selected panel of 18–24 voters reviews one measure; its statements are advisory, and voters still decide the measure at the election.Citizens' initiative reviewSortition / citizens' assembly | Kings of small kingdoms (túatha) under over-kings; assemblies (óenach); customary law expounded by hereditary jurists rather than legislated. | |
| How are conflicts resolved? | Equal time for proponents and opponents; advocates may give feedback on draft statements; an 11-member commission oversees fairness. | Brehon judges; sureties (naidm, ráth, aitire); distraint of livestock; ritual fasting against higher-ranking defendants; body-fines and honour-price compensation.Arbitration | |
| How are public goods funded? | A neutral information resource printed in the official Voters' Pamphlet for every registered voter. | Rules on shared grazing, co-operative ploughing, mills and fencing; obligatory hospitality; churches and monasteries; few public works. | |
| How is AI used? | No documented AI role. | None; a medieval legal order. | |
| What are the main risks? | No state funding; panels run only when money is raised; the statement's reach depends on voters reading the pamphlet; the Commission can review only some measures each cycle. | Status-graded and unequal protection, unfree labour, endemic raiding and dynastic war, and vulnerability to a centralising conqueror.CLM-0385 |
This illustrates differences in design; it is not a universal claim about outcomes. Each cell links to mechanisms and the claims behind them.